<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TechVirtuoso &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techvirtuoso.com/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techvirtuoso.com</link>
	<description>Enterprise technology for and by those who live it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:00:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Nexus One vs The iPhone (and life after iOS)</title>
		<link>http://techvirtuoso.com/2010/07/02/the-nexus-one-vs-the-iphone-and-life-after-ios/</link>
		<comments>http://techvirtuoso.com/2010/07/02/the-nexus-one-vs-the-iphone-and-life-after-ios/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Stanclift</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nexus one]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techvirtuoso.com/?p=1227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I explained in a previous entry on Tuesday, I&#8217;ve made the decision to leave the world of Apple mobile devices for the land of Google Android. To briefly bring you up to speed:
Ever since the iPhone supported Exchange, I’ve been a huge supporter. I’ve spent two good years on the iOS with my iPhone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-large wp-image-1235" title="The Nexus One" src="http://techvirtuoso.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/200px-Nexus_One-125x246.jpg" alt="" width="125" height="246" />As <a href="http://techvirtuoso.com/2010/06/29/decision-is-final-apples-failure-is-sending-me-to-android/">I explained in a previous entry on Tuesday</a>, I&#8217;ve made the decision to leave the world of Apple mobile devices for the land of Google Android. To briefly bring you up to speed:</p>
<blockquote><p>Ever since the iPhone supported Exchange, I’ve been a huge supporter. I’ve spent two good years on the iOS with my iPhone 3G. &#8230; When the iPhone 4 was announced, I followed the WWDC keynote with great anticipation. I ooh’d and aah’d at all the advances in design and software. &#8230; (after getting it) Taking it home that night, I started to notice something was a little off with my phone. &#8230; (antenna issues) I dropped a few calls that weekend, including one to my father who seem’d to have lost my mother, but I could make due. &#8230; The view from most of the people within the Apple world was that it was firmware related, and would be quickly fixed. Then Steve Jobs opened his mouth. &#8230; I found myself deeply disappointed in the device and the operating system. Enough so that I’ve made the switch to Android.</p></blockquote>
<p>There, now that we&#8217;re all up-to-date, I&#8217;m happy to say that my Nexus One is activated and I&#8217;ve had the last couple days to play with it. Having had experience with many different mobile device styles and platforms, including Windows Mobile, Palm OS (the original, not the WebOS) and iPhone, I can honestly say that <strong>the Nexus One and Android OS is the best mobile experience I&#8217;ve ever had.<span id="more-1227"></span></strong></p>
<p>I say play, but really, I use my phone as a tool. It&#8217;s a tool for me to communicate with friends, family and co-workers. Not just through phone calls, but SMS, email, Facebook, Twitter and IM. I need that tool to work reliably all the time, because if its not, I&#8217;m going to miss out on the important events of my life. This shouldn&#8217;t come as a shock to anyone with a smartphone. It&#8217;s pretty standard stuff.</p>
<p>I put a lot of thought into what device to make a switch to, so why did I choose the Nexus One? It&#8217;s been out since January, and can&#8217;t be considered a new device. In two weeks Motorola will release the Droid X and you can already get the HTC EVO 4G from Sprint, today.</p>
<ul>
<li>I needed a solid phone, now. Not on July 15, so that made the Droid X a non-starter.</li>
<li>2x I needed a solid phone now. Since the HTC Incredible is on backorder until the return of Jesus, it&#8217;s not an option, and thus Verizon was out since those were the only two phones I was interested in.</li>
<li>Sprint&#8217;s network in Kansas City can be considered third world, in some areas. Having experienced this while living less than 2 miles from the Sprint world headquarters in Overland Park, while using a Treo 700wx, didn&#8217;t even allow me to consider the HTC EVO 4G.</li>
<li>Everyone I know in this area is on AT&amp;T, because unlike what you may see in San Fransisco or New York, they have the superior network in Kansas City. As a result, my entire family and a large chunk of my local friends are all on AT&amp;T. Seeing as these are the people I communicate with most often, the free mobile-to-mobile made them an attractive network to be on. It&#8217;s also the same network I was with on my business account for the iPhone. This made transferring my number to a personal account a lot easier.</li>
<li>I was attracted to purchasing an unlocked phone and keeping myself out of a contract. Since the Nexus One came direct from Google, and not tied to the provider, I can use it on any GSM network. I realize it would limit me to only two in the US, and if I used T-Mobile on it I&#8217;d only get EDGE speeds for data, but the ability is attractive and also the ability to travel outside the US and swap SIMs without any fuss was one I added into consideration.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Ordering &amp; Delivery</strong></p>
<p>The process of ordering the phone from Google was almost flawless.</p>
<p>I placed an order for the out-of-contract AT&amp;T version on June 29, for $529, at around 9AM. The web store was very straight forward and easy to use. My only complaint is that the confirmation screen can be confusing for those who don&#8217;t know which bands the AT&amp;T phone uses vs the T-Mobile, and it doesn&#8217;t clearly say on the receipt and invoice. However, this was my only complaint. Google gave me the option to engrave a custom message on the back of the phone, for free, but said it would delay the device by up to 72 hours in shipping. Since I needed the phone by next Friday, I opted not to. If I&#8217;d known how fast things would ship, I would have reconsidered. Overnight shipping via FedEx was free. I opted to purchase an extra battery for $25.</p>
<p>By lunchtime Tuesday, my phone had left the Googleplex and was on it&#8217;s way to my office. By 8AM on Wednesday, it was in our campus mailroom ready to use. Less than 24 hours after I&#8217;d placed the order. Already, I&#8217;m impressed at their speed.</p>
<p><strong>Build Quality</strong></p>
<p>Out of the box, the build quality of the Nexus One is obvious. In your hand, it feels lighter than an iPhone 4, about the same as the 3G/3GS. Size wise, it&#8217;s slightly longer and thicker than the iPhone 4, but looks smaller than the 3G/3GS. The face is glass, wrapped in an aluminum band which crosses over the back and bottom of the face. The slightly darker plastic feels very nice to the touch, and is much easier to keep a grip on compared to the all glass back of the iPhone 4, or even the slick plastic back of the 3G/3GS. The curves are attractive, and feel very natural in your hand, compared to the squared off and ridged feel of the iPhone 4.</p>
<p>Other than the glass front, there are no places on the Nexus One where I feel like normal use will damage or scratch the device. The back of my iPhone 3G over the course of 2 years had normal wear and tear, but the iPhone 4 I used for a week, after three days of use, had a large scratch in the glass on the back, right where my wedding ring sits. This scratch was easily visible and easy to FEEL. My tungsten band had cut into the glass after only a short term of casual use. Two days later, another scratch appeared.</p>
<p>I have no indication that the Nexus One will have any of those issues.</p>
<p><strong>Hardware</strong></p>
<p>Apple doesn&#8217;t like to talk about the internals of their devices, unless they actually have a technical advantage over their competition, except to say that their &#8220;magical&#8221; or &#8220;amazing&#8221; &#8212; that said, others constantly tear down and analyze their equipment, so we end up knowing a good deal about them. In contrast, HTC (who makes the Nexus One) and Google (who designed it) are pretty open about the hardware specifications. Reason being, the Nexus One was designed to push mobile devices (and Android) forward, something it has been pretty successful at doing. When the Nexus One came out, the only thing to compare it to in the Apple world was the iPhone 3GS, which in a hardware tear down, the Nexus One was superior in nearly every way. Now that the iPhone 4 is out, we have something else to compare it to&#8230; and in a side by side comparison they stack up pretty well against each other.</p>
<p><em>Processor<br />
<span style="font-style: normal;">The iPhone 4 features a &#8220;custom&#8221; ARM chip called the A4, the same chip that is in the iPad. This chip is able to run at 1GHz but the current understanding is that it&#8217;s purposefully under-clocked by Apple to reduce battery consumption and the amount of heat that it gives off in such a small body.</span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="font-style: normal;">In comparison, the Nexus One features a 1GHz Snapdragon processor. The chip is not underclocked and can actually be over-clocked using non-stock kernels. While Apple sets their chips down a notch to keep them from heating up, I always had issues with iPhone&#8217;s being warm in my hands after long periods of use. With the Nexus One, I&#8217;ve never had that problem.</span></em></p>
<p><em>Memory<br />
<span style="font-style: normal;">Both the Nexus One and iPhone 4 feature 512MB of RAM. The previous 3GS only had 256MB, as does the iPad.</span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="font-style: normal;">In terms of internal storage, the iPhone has the advantage of a built in 16GB/32GB of storage. On the flip side, it is non-expandable. The Nexus One only has 512MB of internal storage for the operating system and applications, however, with Android 2.2 applications can now be installed on the external micro-SD card, which is capable of going to 32GB. Bundled with the phone, is a 4GB card.</span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="font-style: normal;">This is a double edged sword of sorts. Trying to find 16GB microSD cards is no problem, and a great SanDisk card can be found on Newegg or Amazon for as little as $30 plus shipping. However, the jump to the 32GB cards more than quadruples the price in some cases. </span></em><em><span style="font-style: normal;">To be honest, I wish Google would have included a larger card as 4GB is tiny when you start adding pictures, music and video to the device. For the $529 I paid, they could have easily ponied up for a little more memory. Add-in installed applications, and it fills up quick. </span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="font-style: normal;">The best path I&#8217;ve seen is what Motorola is planning for the upcoming Droid X. 8GB of internal storage PLUS a microSD slot able to go to 32GB WITH a 16GB included at purchase. This equals 24GB of storage for the same price (with contract) as a iPhone 4 16GB. If you&#8217;re willing to go a little farther you could surpass the max storage of the iPhone platform at 40GB. (8GB internal + 32GB expanded) &#8212; it&#8217;s my hope that this is the model that every Android phone takes in the future.</span></em></p>
<p><em>Screen<br />
<span style="font-style: normal;">Nothing beats the &#8220;Retina Display&#8221; of the iPhone 4. Nothing. It&#8217;s superior DPI, resolution and color clarity is unparalleled. It looks good in all lighting conditions even at low brightness. It&#8217;s the one thing about the iPhone that anyone can look at and compare the previous versions and instantly see massive improvements.</span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="font-style: normal;">However, the Nexus One screen is still very nice. A lot has been said about the PenTile display and the color clarity, and while it&#8217;s not as nice as the iPhone 4, I find it to be superior to the 3G/3GS screen, and a lot better than most other devices. It&#8217;s also slightly larger than the iPhone 4 (3.7&#8243; vs 3.5&#8243;) which isn&#8217;t a horrible thing. I will say that it takes a little adjustment, and for someone who has smaller than average fingers, any bigger and I&#8217;d be afraid it&#8217;d be too hard to hold. This is one thing where I worry about devices like the Droid X and EVO (4.2&#8243;+), that for most users it&#8217;ll be too large to comfortably hold and type on. Some people like the large screen, I feel that the Nexus One is about the biggest I could comfortably use.</span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="font-style: normal;">I&#8217;ve found that in low/no light, the AMOLED screen on the Nexus One is superior for long term reading compared to the iPhone 4. I like to sit in bed after my wife has gone to sleep, catch Jon Stewart or Letterman on TV and use my phone to read the news, Twitter, etc, and with the iPhone 4 my eyes would get tired and irritated quickly. With the Nexus One screen, it was much easier to use for long periods of time. </span></em></p>
<p><em>Camera<br />
<span style="font-style: normal;">The camera on the iPhone is hard to beat. However, the Nexus One is pretty comparable. Both feature a 5MP sensor with an LED flash. However, the iPhone sensor has a lot more power behind it and as a result the color quality and speed at which the camera fires is superior. Although, the Nexus One seems to have a lot deeper depth of field and a slightly wider angle of view, resulting in images where more of it is in focus. </span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="font-style: normal;">It&#8217;s a trade off, as an proamature photographer, the thought of having a great camera with me at all times is very appealing, and with my iPhone 3G it was my daily shooter for almost anything. There were times I&#8217;d find myself taking pictures of things where my Canon point and shoot or even my Nikon D200 DSLR would have been the far superior choice. However, as Chase Jarvis says (and wrote a book and iPhone app about) &#8220;the best camera is the one you have with you.&#8221;</span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="font-style: normal;">When you look at color quality vs image sharpness/focus, it&#8217;s a tie. However, the speed at which the iPhone 4 is able to perform takes the cake, and when you add in 720p video out of the box (the Nexus One will do it with third party software) it&#8217;s impossible to do anything but hand it to Apple on this.</span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="font-style: normal;">My ONE caveat in saying that, is that iOS 4 currently has a bug that adds a &#8220;green ghost&#8221; to the center of images taken under florescent lighting. However, I&#8217;m confident Apple will correct this and as pointed out to me, HTC has had issues like this in the past, and even the big dogs of Nikon and Canon who do nothing but make cameras have similar issues with their high end DSLRs that frequently require firmware updates to correct.</span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="font-style: normal;"><strong>Android vs iOS</strong></span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="font-style: normal;">I could spend the next three days comparing these two operating systems, their features, multitasking abilities (or inabilities) and their quirks. But, there are already many reviews out there doing exactly that. However, I will point out a few key points that I find beneficial on each platform.</span></em></p>
<p><span style="font-style: normal;"><em>Integration<br />
<span style="font-style: normal;">The Nexus One is probably the only fair comparison to the iPhone when it comes to the integration of hardware and software. It&#8217;s the only device that Google has had total control (along with their partner HTC) in building the device and designing the Android OS around it. Obviously this is Apple&#8217;s primary business model in all of their hardware products, and little explanation of the benefits they see from it are needed.</span></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-style: normal;"><em><span style="font-style: normal;">That said, Android is very well integrated with the Nexus One, and the entire process of using the device is nearly perfect end-to-end in terms of tie in with other Google powered services such as the Maps, Gmail, Contacts, Calendar, Google Talk, Google Voice and of course Search. The fact that every text box or search field can be powered by voice commands that are highly accurate (as long as you speak clearly) is a huge plus. In contrast, Apple has to rely on a lot of third party technologies that are integrated with the iPhone like&#8230; Google Maps and Search. Even Apple&#8217;s implementation of MobileMe as an &#8220;all in one&#8221; provider of email, calendar and contacts is somewhat flawed. My wife uses MobileMe for her primary email after purchasing a 3GS and we&#8217;re just waiting for it to expire and switch her to Gmail or Live Mail after their ActiveSync service comes online. She complains constantly about MobileMe not pushing email and about calendar events disappearing. Problems I didn&#8217;t even have with iOS tied to Microsoft Exchange 2003/2007, which always seemed to work flawlessly.</span></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-style: normal;"><em><span style="font-style: normal;">The Nexus One is pure Google, end to end. For some people who worry about what Mountain View and their datacenters are up to, that&#8217;s scary, but the device is very well integrated into all their services. It&#8217;s a total Google package, or as they put it &#8220;the Google experience.&#8221;</span></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-style: normal;"><em>Notifications<br />
<span style="font-style: normal;">The funny thing about the iPhone notifications system, is that it didn&#8217;t used to bother me, until I used the Android system and saw how far superior it is. No more hunting for desktop icons with indicators, spread across multiple screens, with Android every system or program notification is displayed in a single drop down menu at the top of the status bar. They can all be cleared with the push of one button, or opened and flipped back to the app that needs your attention. No app can overtake another app you&#8217;re viewing with random status windows, they all cleanly take their place and await your attention in the top corner.</span></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-style: normal;"><em><span style="font-style: normal;">In this area, the Android OS is superior to the iOS in every way. </span></em></span><em><span style="font-style: normal;">Maybe for iOS 5, Apple can finally implement a </span>real </em>notification system.</p>
<p><em>Applications<br />
<span style="font-style: normal;">One of the things I was really worried about after making the switch, was that the applications I&#8217;d grown to love on the iPhone, wouldn&#8217;t be there on the Nexus One. I was wrong.</span></em></p>
<p>While the Android Market features a fraction of what the iTunes App Store has, it&#8217;s only been around a fraction of the time. The built in Twitter and Facebook applications for Android are top notch, and beautifully integrate into the Contact list on the phone, as well as flow with the rest of the Android interface. While the Twitter application lacks some of the advanced features of the official iPhone Twitter App (aka Tweetie 2) it&#8217;s still a great application. The upcoming social networking platforms like Foursquare all have their official applications, as well as many others. To my great surprise, I&#8217;ve yet to be unable to find <em>the app I was looking for</em> in the Market. In many cases, the application developers have ported their programs to Android and in other cases, a nearly identical program exists. I don&#8217;t do a lot of gaming on my phone, so I can&#8217;t speak to the Market vs App Store in that respect, but there are plenty of other resources that can if you know where to look.</p>
<p>One thing the Market has that Steve Jobs would rather die before he allows is a open submission process. There are apps in the Market that <em>require</em> your phone to be &#8220;rooted&#8221; to function. (For you iPhone users, root = jailbreak+) &#8212; And beyond that, with the click of check box, non-market approved applications can be installed from any source.</p>
<p><em>Updates<br />
<span style="font-style: normal;">Because the Nexus One is the Google flagship phone, it&#8217;s been updated pretty frequently since it&#8217;s launch. Other Android phones have not been so lucky and official 2.2/Froyo updates for devices like the Droid and EVO have yet to be released, and some devices such as the Hero and Moment may never get official updates. My Nexus One came with Android 2.1 installed, and since then has been updated twice. Once as a full upgrade to Android 2.2 soon after unboxing, and again last night with a security patch. While the frequency of updates for all devices leaves something to be desired (and Apple has Google beat in this department) the method in which updates come really shakes Apple&#8217;s tree.</span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="font-style: normal;">The over the air update process for Android is something Apple should be looking into right now, if they&#8217;re not already. I have known too many iPhone owners who&#8217;ve never even plugged their phone into a computer, let alone sync&#8217;d and updated with iTunes. As a result, people on the iPhone 3G can still be running 2.0 firmware when there is 3.1.3 or 4.0 for their consumption.</span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="font-style: normal;">The manual update process for Android is fast, and fairly simple. On the Nexus One it&#8217;s simply a matter of copying the updated firmware to the SD card, rebooting the phone while holding down a magic button combo, and selecting the firmware update. The upgrade from 2.1 to 2.2 took around 5 minutes, and the patch last night was about 2 minutes. This includes copying the file to the card and booting the device into the update mode. Most times it takes iTunes/iPhone this long to even begin the process syncing to tell you there is an upgrade for the phone. Then there is a process of writing the entire upgraded firmware to the phone (300MB) instead of just what needs updating (900KB) &#8212; in my view, Android wins. For anyone technical enough to read this website, the manual update process should be a cakewalk.</span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="font-style: normal;">For the average non-technical user who actually does sync, and stays up to date, the iTunes method is probably superior to the manual update method&#8230; but nothing beats over the air updates.</span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="font-style: normal;"><strong>Final</strong></span></em></p>
<p>In conclusion, I have found the Nexus One to be superior for my needs as a power user. If you&#8217;re the type of person who buys an iPhone just to jailbreak it soon after, or finds themselves restricted by Apple&#8217;s methods, then Android is the obvious choice to switch to. The Nexus One, while not fully superior hardware wise to the iPhone 4, can hold it&#8217;s own in processing power, and when combined with Google&#8217;s fully integrated and yet open platform, is a win-win.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been very happy thus far with my choice to switch, even from the latest and greatest that Apple has to offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://js-kit.com/rss/techvirtuoso.com/p=1227</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome to include Adobe Flash player</title>
		<link>http://techvirtuoso.com/2010/03/30/google-chrome-to-include-adobe-flash-player/</link>
		<comments>http://techvirtuoso.com/2010/03/30/google-chrome-to-include-adobe-flash-player/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Stanclift</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html5]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techvirtuoso.com/?p=1070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a move that is sure to anger those who like total control over the software on their computers, Google has teamed up with Adobe to bundle Flash player with their Chrome browser. From the announcement on the Chromium Blog:
Today, we’re making available an initial integration of Flash Player with Chrome in the developer channel. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-1071" href="http://techvirtuoso.com/2010/03/30/google-chrome-to-include-adobe-flash-player/google_chrome_icon/"><img class="alignright size-large wp-image-1071" title="google_chrome_icon" src="http://techvirtuoso.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/google_chrome_icon-253x246.jpg" alt="" width="253" height="246" /></a>In a move that is sure to anger those who like total control over the software on their computers, Google has teamed up with Adobe to bundle Flash player with their Chrome browser. <a href="http://blog.chromium.org/2010/03/bringing-improved-support-for-adobe.html">From the announcement on the Chromium Blog</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Today, we’re making available an initial integration of Flash Player with Chrome in the developer channel. We plan to bring this functionality to all Chrome users as quickly as we can.</p>
<p>We believe this initiative will help our users in the following ways:</p>
<ul>
<li>When users download Chrome, they will also receive the latest version of Adobe Flash Player. There will be no need to install Flash Player separately.</li>
<li>Users will automatically receive updates related to Flash Player using Google Chrome’s auto-update mechanism. This eliminates the need to manually download separate updates and reduces the security risk of using outdated versions.</li>
<li>With Adobe&#8217;s help, we plan to further protect users by extending Chrome&#8217;s “sandbox” to web pages with Flash content.</li>
</ul>
<p>Improving the traditional browser plug-in model will make it possible for plug-ins to be just as fast, stable, and secure as the browser’s HTML and JavaScript engines. Over time this will enable HTML, Flash, and other plug-ins to be used together more seamlessly in rendering and scripting.</p></blockquote>
<p>Those who were hoping to see HTML5 deal a killshot to Flash, should be very disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://js-kit.com/rss/techvirtuoso.com/p=1070</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why lazy sysadmins and IE 6 make the net unsafe</title>
		<link>http://techvirtuoso.com/2010/01/16/why-lazy-sysadmins-and-internet-explorer-6-make-the-net-unsafe/</link>
		<comments>http://techvirtuoso.com/2010/01/16/why-lazy-sysadmins-and-internet-explorer-6-make-the-net-unsafe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 16:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Stanclift</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lazy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sysadmin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntexec.com/?p=922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The number of businesses still using Internet Explorer 6 is painful to see. Coupled with the fact that all of them are on Windows XP or Windows 2000, it turns from pain into terror, especially when it comes to security.
For a lot of system administrators, the reasons to stay outweigh the reasons to upgrade. Websites [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://techvirtuoso.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/mw_ie6_03.gif"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-925" style="margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" title="mw_ie6_03" src="http://www.ntexec.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/mw_ie6_03-150x150.gif" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>The number of businesses still using Internet Explorer 6 is painful to see. Coupled with the fact that all of them are on Windows XP or Windows 2000, it turns from pain into terror, especially when it comes to security.</p>
<p>For a lot of system administrators, the reasons to stay outweigh the reasons to upgrade. Websites that break, plugins that won&#8217;t load, old software that isn&#8217;t updated anymore. Trust me, I&#8217;ve been there. However, a lot of it boils down to lazy and poor practices of system administration.</p>
<p>Yes, you&#8217;re lazy and you&#8217;re bad at your job. Internet Explorer 6 was released in 2001. Yes, 2001, most of us don&#8217;t even drive cars that old, let alone unleash people on the &#8220;information superhighway&#8221; with a browser that old. It was designed at a time when security was not the issue it is today. It was designed to work on operating systems like <strong>Windows 98 and Windows ME. </strong>Would you let people use Windows ME on your network? No! So why are you letting them use a browser that was built for it?!<span id="more-922"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;But it&#8217;s not our fault, we don&#8217;t write the bad software, or the non-compliant websites.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, you don&#8217;t. But you have the responsibility and the power to keep your network, and the rest of the Internet safe.</p>
<p>The replacement for IE6 has been out now for just under 4 years. Actually, the replacement for it&#8217;s replacement has been out almost a year. Meaning all you lazy administrators had <strong>two chances</strong> to migrate your systems over to an updated browser. Yes, you&#8217;re lazy. If you have applications that &#8220;require&#8221; Internet Explorer 6, the decision should have been made to dump them or upgrade them long ago. A line in the sand should have been drawn that said you were not willing to support such an old and insecure piece of software.</p>
<p>Why is this such a big deal? Because security threats targeting users of Internet Explorer 6 continue to threaten the security of the Internet, and of your own network. Just this week, Microsoft admitted that IE6 was one of the vectors used to attack companies like Google. Why is Google still using Internet Explorer 6? Or I guess a better question is, why is Google even using Internet Explorer at all, when they develop Chrome? Either way, it&#8217;s disappointing to see that a company like Google, who tends to be on the bleeding edge of updates, is doing something stupid like running a almost decade old browser.</p>
<p>The most recent threat, has no effect on users of Internet Explorer 7 or 8, even on Windows XP. Actually, Jonathan Ness over at <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/srd/archive/2010/01/15/assessing-risk-of-ie-0day-vulnerability.aspx">MSRC Engineering</a> put together a nice little chart explaining what browsers and operating systems are at risk with the latest attack vector.</p>
<p><a href="http://techvirtuoso.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/table.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-924 alignnone" title="table" src="http://techvirtuoso.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/table.png" alt="" width="588" height="277" /></a></p>
<p>The short of it, if you&#8217;re still running Windows 2000 on workstations, you should be fired. If you&#8217;re running Windows XP and Internet Explorer 6, you should march into your CIO&#8217;s office on Monday and demand that you <em>at least </em>figure out how to migrate to Internet Explorer 7 ASAP, meanwhile worry that your network isn&#8217;t the next one to be attacked by these unpatched exploits. If you&#8217;re running Internet Explorer 7, you should turn DEP on to prevent future threats, or see if migrating to Internet Explorer 8 is possible.</p>
<p>But really, for the small group who has already migrated to Windows Vista or Windows 7, enjoy your weekend.</p>
<p>To all my fellow sysadmins out there: <strong>Stop being lazy, and start securing your networks.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://js-kit.com/rss/techvirtuoso.com/p=922</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Android road warrior has phone, ISO connectivity</title>
		<link>http://techvirtuoso.com/2009/11/23/android-road-warrior/</link>
		<comments>http://techvirtuoso.com/2009/11/23/android-road-warrior/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane Pitman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PdaNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techvirtuoso.com/?p=785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I stated in my previous post, I have left the world of BlackBerry and Microsoft Exchange behind and transitioned my e-mail, calendar, contacts, and mobile platform to Google Apps and Android. Doing so was no small decision, as my &#8220;day job&#8221; requires that I have access to all of these items and that they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://techvirtuoso.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/junefabrics.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-790" title="junefabrics" src="http://techvirtuoso.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/junefabrics.jpg" alt="junefabrics" width="250" height="100" /></a>As <a href="http://techvirtuoso.com/2009/11/20/goodbye-rim-microsoft-hello-android-google-apps/" target="_blank">I stated in my previous post</a>, I have left the world of BlackBerry and Microsoft Exchange behind and transitioned my e-mail, calendar, contacts, and mobile platform to Google Apps and Android. Doing so was no small decision, as my &#8220;day job&#8221; requires that I have access to all of these items and that they work in unison with each other, my desktop, my laptop, and that I have access to my data anywhere at any time.</p>
<p>I own an IT consulting firm, and as you can imagine, that means that I am not always in the office, and don&#8217;t always have connectivity available. With my BlackBerry, it was as simple as loading the Sprint SmartView software on my laptop (similar applications are provided by most carriers) and using my BlackBerry&#8217;s data connection. However, SmartView doesn&#8217;t work with the Samsung Moment, and <a href="http://community.sprint.com/baw/community/sprintblogs/chat-with-buzz/blog/2009/10/29/david-owens-chat-transcript--1029#__highlight&amp;id16=David+Owens" target="_blank">Sprint has made the (poor) decision to do away with tethering</a> or &#8220;Phone-As-Modem&#8221; options on their Simply Everything plans which are required plans for their smartphones. I speculate that their reason for doing away with tethering is an effort to drive customers to the increasing number of mobile broadband devices that they carry, including the new Novatel MiFi 2200 router, but I&#8217;ll save that gripe for another post.</p>
<p><span id="more-785"></span>So it seems that all is lost, I can no longer tether my phone to my laptop to use the data connection, and that&#8217;s a deal breaker. Weighing my options, door number one, I stay with BlackBerry and keep on trucking, but that&#8217;s not going to be a long term solution as Sprint will eventually drop tethering from my account. Door number two, I buy another device with another data plan, and I&#8217;m good to go. But why? Why should I have to fork out the money for another device, have something else to carry around, power, charge, and pay a monthly fee to use when I have a perfectly capable connection hanging on my belt, that I&#8217;ve been using for over a year, especially when I know full well that the only reason Sprint is making this change is to try to dig deeper into the pockets of smartphone carrying business professionals. Sprint, I&#8217;m still not against you, but I found door number three and I&#8217;m taking it (yes, it&#8217;s a line from National treasure).</p>
<p>One of the great things about the Android platform is the Android Market and the incredible amount of software that is available, more often than not, for free. One of these applications is <a href="http://www.junefabrics.com/index.php" target="_blank">June Fabrics PdaNet</a>, a tethering application that is available for several platforms, including Android. Setup is painless on both the phone and the PC, but useage is a little different than what I was used to. The most noticeable difference, which I&#8217;ve already hinted at, is that you actually install PdaNet on both the phone and the PC that you wish to use it with. Once installed on both, you connect the phone to the PC via USB or bluetooth (Android 2.0 required for bluetooth tethering on the Android platform), launch the application on your phone and enable your connection method, right click the PdaNet tray icon on your PC, and select Connect.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it, you are now using your phone&#8217;s data connection on your PC. PdaNet is one of the many applications available on the Android Market that provides a paid version and a &#8220;lite&#8221; or free version. The paid version gives you full use of your data connection, while the free version restricts you to http web access only. If you&#8217;re on the go as much as I am, you&#8217;re going to want the full version. The good news is that it&#8217;s cheap, $29.00 one time. I was paying an extra $15 a month for tethering when Sprint offered it.</p>
<p>This was one of the most crucial obstacles to overcome in order for me to be able to transition to the Android platform as a mobile business professional. Next time I&#8217;ll discuss some of the other applications and tools that I have found to make Android <em>the</em> platform for business now and in the near future.</p>
<p><img id="myFxSearchImg" style="border: medium none ; position: absolute; z-index: 2147483647; opacity: 0.6; display: none;" src="%3D" alt="" width="24" height="24" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://js-kit.com/rss/techvirtuoso.com/p=785</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goodbye RIM, Microsoft, hello Android, Google Apps</title>
		<link>http://techvirtuoso.com/2009/11/20/goodbye-rim-microsoft-hello-android-google-apps/</link>
		<comments>http://techvirtuoso.com/2009/11/20/goodbye-rim-microsoft-hello-android-google-apps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane Pitman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techvirtuoso.com/?p=764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those of you who know me, know that I have been an avid BlackBerry proponent for many years. I held fast to the opinion that BlackBerry coupled with Microsoft Exchange was the solution for business mobile communications. Be it BlackBerry Enterprise Server or Microsoft ActiveSync, I held steadfast in my opinion that nothing could perform [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://techvirtuoso.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/android.gif"><img class="alignright size-large wp-image-766" title="android" src="http://techvirtuoso.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/android-127x127-custom.gif" alt="android" width="127" height="127" /></a>Those of you who know me, know that I have been an avid BlackBerry proponent for many years. I held fast to the opinion that BlackBerry coupled with Microsoft Exchange was <em>the</em> solution for business mobile communications. Be it BlackBerry Enterprise Server or Microsoft ActiveSync, I held steadfast in my opinion that nothing could perform as well or better in maintaining perfect harmony between my desktop, my laptop, my phone, and anywhere access to my information. I am here to say, that era has ended. A moment of silence, please. Now that the mourning is over, let me tell you the changes I&#8217;ve made, how, and why.</p>
<p>First, let me say that I had not been looking to leave the BlackBerry/Exchange family, but I <em>was</em> holding out for a full screen BlackBerry with a physical keyboard, a slider if you will. Those of you who follow mobile devices closely, especially those who follow BlackBerry hardware, are well aware of the numerous design concept drawings, mock-ups, etc. of a BlackBerry slider that have been floating around for at least a year. Never revealing just exactly when we would see such a device, RIM has only been willing to confirm that several design options have been considered. This secrecy is nothing unusual among device manufacturers, but the lack of information and an opportunity provided by a competitor presents a precarious position, and, in this case, caused a long time RIM fan to jump ship.</p>
<p><span id="more-764"></span>One of my fellow TechVirtuoso staffers, Eric Iles, made the move to the Palm Pre when it first came out earlier this year. He had several problems with the device that caused him to go through a few of the phones before getting one that seemed to work without issues. Even though Eric finally worked through the issues he was having with the phone and seemed to finally have a working unit, he still wasn&#8217;t happy with the device, or the lack of applications available. Eric ended up switching to the HTC Hero, Sprint&#8217;s first offering on Google&#8217;s Android platform. I visited the local Sprint store several times and played around with the Hero. I really liked the look and feel of Android, and HTC&#8217;s custom Sense UI is very aesthetically appealing. The only thing I couldn&#8217;t get used to, and it turned out to be a deal breaker for me, no physical keyboard. This wasn&#8217;t a huge surprise for me. I have never liked typing on <em>any</em> touchscreen phone. My daughter has a Samsung Instinct, I hate it. I&#8217;ve used friends iPhones, hate them too. I have big fingers, and no matter how much I &#8220;train&#8221; the phones, I always seem to spend more time hitting backspace than I want. So, the HTC Hero was a no go for me. Then along came Polly, err&#8230; Moment.</p>
<p>Having told Eric that I couldn&#8217;t get used to the on screen keyboard, he directed me to a Sprint press release announcing the Samsung Moment, a slider Android based phone, that was due out on November 1st. Monday, November 2nd, I was at the Sprint store. Having gotten my hands on the HTC Hero several times, and having read as much online as I could, I was somewhat familiar with the overall functions of the Android OS. I was more interested in how the Samsung Moment felt, how the keyboard worked, and whether or not I would be able to type on it reliably. I spent about 20 minutes looking over the Moment, and decided to make the jump, and just to make sure I saw it through and wouldn&#8217;t have a crutch to fall back on, I let Sprint buyback my BlackBerry Curve. I was going Android.</p>
<p>Once the transactions were complete, the new phone configured, my next concern was getting my e-mail, calendar, contacts, etc. setup on my new phone. I ran my own Exchange server and my own BlackBerry Enterprise Server, and was considering setting up ActiveSync and just moving forward. Once again, Eric offered up a suggestion, that I should take a look at Google Apps, and moving my e-mail and letting Google host it. Our TechVirtuoso e-mail is Google hosted, as was our e-mail at our previous venture, and we&#8217;ve had nothing but positive results with it. After I thought about it for a day or two, I thought, why not. It takes the responsibility off of me, it will simplify the unison of data between my devices, and if I don&#8217;t like it, it&#8217;s easy enough to switch it back. Back, don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s a direction I&#8217;ll be taking.</p>
<p>Signing up for Google Apps Standard (free) Edition is simple, and in doing so, provides the opportunity to try Google Apps Premier free for 30 days. This is key, because Google Apps Premier gives you access to Google&#8217;s migration tools which provide you with easy solutions for migrating your existing data from another server, such as a Microsoft Exchange Server. So, I signed up for my Google Apps Standard account and registered for the free 30 day trial of Google Apps Premier, setup the Exchange migration to pull my existing contacts, calendar, e-mail, etc. from my Microsoft Exchange Server, and let it run overnight. The next morning the transfer was complete, and I canceled my 30 day trial of Google Apps Premier, reverting my account to Google Apps Standard. I now have all of my mail, contacts, calendar, etc. transferred over to my new Google hosted e-mail service, it&#8217;s automatically synchronized on my phone, my laptop, any PC for that matter, as I just log into my account via the web and there it is, wherever I am.</p>
<p>This is where I start experimenting with the Android platform, and finding out for myself just how useful and business friendly it is. I&#8217;ll save those thoughts for my next post, so stay tuned!</p>
<p><img id="myFxSearchImg" style="border: medium none; position: absolute; z-index: 2147483647; opacity: 0.6; display: none;" src="%3D" alt="" width="24" height="24" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://js-kit.com/rss/techvirtuoso.com/p=764</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Sync now supports push mail sync</title>
		<link>http://techvirtuoso.com/2009/09/22/google-sync-now-supports-push-mail-sync/</link>
		<comments>http://techvirtuoso.com/2009/09/22/google-sync-now-supports-push-mail-sync/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frank Owen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Sync]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[push mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techvirtuoso.com/?p=548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the problems that Google has faced with the fight to pull users from their Exchange environment to Google Apps was the ability to Sync Email, Contacts and Calendar appointments to a user&#8217;s Windows Mobile Phone.
Google released Google Sync (http://www.google.com/mobile/products/sync.html) earlier in the year but it only supported Calendar and Contacts.  They have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the problems that Google has faced with the fight to pull users from their Exchange environment to Google Apps was the ability to Sync Email, Contacts and Calendar appointments to a user&#8217;s Windows Mobile Phone.</p>
<p>Google released Google Sync (http://www.google.com/mobile/products/sync.html) earlier in the year but it only supported Calendar and Contacts.  They have now released an update that will also support pushing Email to any device that supports the Microsoft ActiveSync protocol.  With this addition to their arsenal of features the Google Apps solution may turn into more of a threat to other well established enterprise email solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://js-kit.com/rss/techvirtuoso.com/p=548</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palm drops Windows Mobile in favor of webOS</title>
		<link>http://techvirtuoso.com/2009/09/18/palm-drops-windows-mobile-in-favor-of-webos/</link>
		<comments>http://techvirtuoso.com/2009/09/18/palm-drops-windows-mobile-in-favor-of-webos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Stanclift</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techvirtuoso.com/?p=500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Palm has announced that they will no longer be incorporating Microsoft Windows Mobile onto new devices, stating a commitment to the future of their new webOS platform, present on the recently released Palm Pre. Windows Mobile was first released on a Palm device back in 2006 with the Palm Treo 700w, later followed up by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-large wp-image-501" title="palm-pre-webos-lg" src="http://techvirtuoso.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/palm-pre-webos-lg-191x246.jpg" alt="palm-pre-webos-lg" width="191" height="246" />Palm has announced that they will no longer be incorporating Microsoft Windows Mobile onto new devices, stating a commitment to the future of their new webOS platform, present on the recently released Palm Pre. Windows Mobile was first released on a Palm device back in 2006 with the Palm Treo 700w, later followed up by the 700Wx, 750 and Treo Pro. <font color="white">8xkqt5hwir</font></p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re making significant process with Palm&#8217;s transformation, and our culture of innovation is stronger than ever. We&#8217;re launching more great Palm webOS products with more carriers and turning our sights toward growth,&#8221; said Jon Rubinstein, chairman and CEO.</p>
<p>This move comes as a blow to Microsoft, which is struggling against up and coming smartphone OS providers in the business sector like Palm webOS, Google Android, Apple iPhone and the continued fight against Research in Motion&#8217;s Blackberry.</p>
<p>According to Garner, at the end of 2008, the estimated market share for Windows Mobile, worldwide, in the smartphone market was 12.4% &#8212; currently many of the those phones are made by Taiwan based HTC, however they&#8217;ve began releasing many of their new phones with Google&#8217;s Android platform, so it remains to be seen what their continued commitment to Windows Mobile will be.</p>
<p>However, the move could backfire on Palm, as some businesses continue to see devices like the Pre as more of a consumer oriented device and will opt for Windows Mobile and Blackberry which provide better support for Exchange and more enhanced and native device security.</p>
<p>Yesterday Palm, together with Sprint, revealed they&#8217;d only sold around 810,000 Pre devices in the last quarter. (In comparison the iPhone 3GS sold over 1 million units in the first week and over 5 million in the quarter.) Palm also announced yesterday losses for the quarter reached $164.5 million, compared to a loss of only $41.9 million last year. However, this did beat industry expectations for the company. Palm says they expect revenues for the next quarter to be even lower than their last.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://js-kit.com/rss/techvirtuoso.com/p=500</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
